16.1.07

the musings of gay black disabled phil

according to current government definitions, someone is 'disadvantaged' (for the purpose of making grant money available to them) if they are:
  • disabled
  • gay
  • black
  • 'ethnic'
what do you think? is this true where you live? and how on earth do gay people dress so well on a tight budget?[1]

1. perhaps this isn't always true

No comments: